King George-winning coach John ‘Shark’ Hanlon has seen a 10-month suspension diminished to 6 after an attraction.
Hanlon was handed the prolonged ban in September for “gross negligence” referring to the transportation of a deceased horse.
Hanlon, who trains final 12 months’s Kempton hero Hewick, was initially discovered to have acted in a way that “caused significant prejudice to the integrity, proper conduct and good reputation of the sport of racing” within the removing of a useless horse from his yard earlier this 12 months.
The horse was carried on an open trailer which was towed by Hanlon’s branded horsebox, with the physique left on show to the general public after a tarpaulin turned displaced in the course of the journey.
A member of the general public videoed the incident and it was broadly circulated on social media, which attracted additional media consideration and led to the IHRB bringing fees towards Hanlon.
Hanlon, who may have his license withdrawn from December 1 this 12 months, introduced he can be promoting 28 of his horses on the Goffs UK October HIT & Yearling Gross sales going down this week.
In giving its verdict on the attraction, the panel stated: “Having thought-about all the proof and arguments we now have come to the conclusion that the Referrals Committee must have mounted a shorter headline sanction of six months on this case with a view to take account of a significant distinction between Mr Hanlon’s conduct and that of Messrs. Elliott and James.
“In their cases, the lack of respect demonstrated to the carcass of the deceased animal in each case was deliberate and wilful. Mr Hanlon’s was not. He was negligent albeit to a high degree. We do not think that the reduction of the headline penalty from one of 12 months withdrawal of licence to 10 months adequately addresses that major difference.
“It additionally needs to be borne in thoughts that the negligence of Mr Hanlon occurred in a single exercise of comparatively brief length. We’re not to be taken as holding that negligence as distinct from a deliberate act may not appeal to a 10- and even 12-month withdrawal of licence in acceptable circumstances. Had there been persevering with acts of negligence right here, then the 10-month determine would possibly nicely be justified.
“However, that was not the case and so we are of opinion that the headline figure of six months withdrawal is the correct one.”
