The Scottish Soccer Affiliation (SFA) has accused Rangers of issuing “misleading comments” of their criticism of the punishment handed down for a comment from former participant John Brown on the membership’s media channels.
Rangers have been fined £3,000 following a disciplinary listening to after being charged with breaching rule 38, which states that golf equipment mustn’t enable any criticism of match officers “calculated to indicate bias or incompetence” or to “impinge upon his character”.
Brown, whereas working as a pundit on Rangers TV, claimed a choice to not award Rangers a purpose at Easter Street on the ultimate weekend of the league season was “corruption” amid a debate over whether or not the ball had crossed the road.
Rangers on Thursday claimed that they had “flagged numerous examples of similar incidents on club channels” throughout the listening to and questioned a “lack of consistency” with the SFA’s strategy.
An SFA assertion learn: “We observe Rangers’ response to the willpower of a current impartial Judicial Panel Tribunal. Within the pursuits of accuracy, we want to deal with a few of the deceptive feedback contained therein.
“The sanction imposed by an impartial panel was fully in step with the applying of the principles. The latest and related instance of an identical breach, the sanction imposed on Richard Foster of Motherwell FC for feedback of an identical nature within the media, attests to that.
Motherwell growth coach Foster was handed a six-match touchline ban final September after branding the governing physique’s rationalization for a contentiously-awarded purpose by Rangers striker Cyriel Dessers in opposition to St Johnstone “lies” whereas working as a pundit for BBC Scotland.
“Furthermore, to address the comments regarding ‘rationale behind differing outcomes’, we wish to point to the fact that investigations were undertaken in previous cases outlined and that the compliance officers of the time saw fit to issue a censure by way of warning letter for potential breaches deemed insufficiently serious to be progressed to a notice of complaint,” continued the SFA assertion.
“This system of proportionality has been adopted since the inception of the Judicial Panel Protocol in 2011. Indeed, such discretion was exercised last season when the compliance officer wrote to (Rangers) to warn of the future conduct of players following matters involving Vaclav Cerny, Dujon Sterling and Mohamed Diomande.
“We additionally observe that Rangers intend to contact the affiliation to hunt readability on the Judicial Panel Protocol and its utility. The membership is, in actual fact, already represented on the JPP Working Group.
“We have requested written reasons from the panel chair involved in the tribunal and in the interests of transparency will publish in due course.
“JPP Rule 38 was launched in response to the referee strike of 2010, when match officers campaigned for larger safety after enduring sustained private criticism from golf equipment and followers. Forward of a brand new season, we remind golf equipment of their duties on this regard.”
What did Brown do?
Nico Raskin looked to have scored during Rangers’ final game of the season against Hibs with the ball appearing to cross the line before being cleared by Rocky Bushiri before the hosts equalised soon after.
VAR did not intervene as there was “no conclusive proof/angle to say the ball had absolutely crossed the road to award Rangers a second purpose”.
Angered by the decision, Brown said on Rangers TV: “I’d say it’s corrupt.”
Commentator Tom Miller cautioned: “Effectively, I am undecided we will truly say that”, before Brown continued: “Effectively, I’m saying it.”
What did Rangers say?
In a strongly worded statement on Thursday, Rangers said they had “flagged quite a few examples of comparable incidents on membership channels” as part of their defence adding “these incidents increase reliable questions on Scottish FA guidelines and the way constantly they’re enforced.”
“To our data, none of those circumstances seem to have resulted in costs in opposition to the respective golf equipment.
“The lack of consistency with the Scottish FA’s policing of similar incidents leaves more questions than answers. That is why we will be contacting the Scottish FA chief executive and president to seek clarity on what policies and processes the compliance officer has in place, if any, to ensure a consistent and proportionate approach to enforcement and the equal treatment of member clubs.
“We will even be asking the Scottish FA whether or not they settle for {that a} rule that can’t be utilized constantly throughout all golf equipment and all platforms dangers dropping credibility as a good and enforceable regulation.”
The statement added: “In selecting to pursue this case, the Scottish FA has opened the door to nearer scrutiny of how related conditions are dealt with going ahead. If that is now the usual, they are going to be watched carefully to make sure it’s utilized throughout the board, constantly, with out exception and with out favour.”
Rangers assertion in full
“We feel it is necessary to highlight the broader concerns this outcome raises and the wider implications this has for clarity and confidence in their regulatory processes.
“John Brown spoke emotionally and spontaneously as somebody who cares deeply in regards to the membership. His phrases weren’t scripted, they usually weren’t an official membership remark. The ruling nevertheless units a precedent the place even spontaneous, corrected remarks made throughout stay protection of a transparent refereeing error are sufficient to set off a proper sanction. That’s neither proportionate nor constant, particularly when different golf equipment have made stronger feedback on official platforms with out consequence.
“As part of our defence today, we flagged numerous examples of similar incidents on club channels. These incidents raise legitimate questions about Scottish FA rules and how consistently they are enforced. To our knowledge, none of these cases appear to have resulted in charges against the respective clubs.
“The shortage of consistency with the Scottish FA’s policing of comparable incidents leaves extra questions than solutions. That’s the reason we might be contacting the Scottish FA Chief Govt and President to hunt readability on what insurance policies and processes the Compliance Officer has in place, if any, to make sure a constant and proportionate strategy to enforcement and the equal remedy of member golf equipment. We will even be asking the Scottish FA whether or not they settle for {that a} rule that can’t be utilized constantly throughout all golf equipment and all platforms dangers dropping credibility as a good and enforceable regulation.
“Our aim here is to understand the rationale behind the differing outcomes. A lack of consistency, or the perception of it, undermines confidence in the disciplinary process and exposes all member clubs to uncertainty about what is and is not allowed.
“There stays no clear steering on how golf equipment are anticipated to handle stay broadcast content material, although we observe the panel acknowledged that the membership’s inside editorial tips could function a constructive step for others going ahead.
“To be clear, we referenced these other examples not to suggest they should have resulted in sanctions, but to highlight the clear inconsistency in how similar incidents have been handled. Club media channels are, by nature, passionate and partisan. Informal, tongue-in-cheek and emotional commentary comes with the territory, especially in live settings.
“However, in selecting to pursue this case, the Scottish FA has opened the door to nearer scrutiny of how related conditions are dealt with going ahead. If that is now the usual, they are going to be watched carefully to make sure it’s utilized throughout the board, constantly, with out exception and with out favour.”
Sky Sports activities to indicate 215 stay PL video games from subsequent season
Watch extra Premier League matches on Sky Sports activities ever earlier than with 215 video games stay of the 2025/26 Premier League season
From subsequent season, Sky Sports activities’ Premier League protection will enhance from 128 matches to at the very least 215 video games completely stay.
And 80 per cent of all televised Premier League video games subsequent season are on Sky Sports activities
