Match Officers Mic’d Up: PGMOL chief Howard Webb believes VAR ought to have overturned Bruno Fernandes’ purple card vs Tottenham

PGMOL chief Howard Webb believes VAR ought to have overturned Bruno Fernandes’ purple card for Manchester United in opposition to Tottenham because of the participant slipping earlier than contact was made.

With United trailing Spurs 1-0 in direction of the top of the primary half, Fernandes was despatched off for slipping then catching James Maddison excessive on the leg, with referee Chris Kavanagh instantly displaying a purple card.

United went on to lose 3-0 to Tottenham and Webb believes VAR Peter Bankes ought to have stepped in to vary the choice.

WHAT OFFICIALS SAID:

Assistant referee: That is terrible mate. That is a purple card for me, 100 per cent. On-field choice is purple card.

VAR: It is not studs. It is shin peak. It is a deliberate act and made no try and play the ball. The angle would not present it is with studs. There’s a slip however I believe ref’s name.

WEBB’S VERDICT: It was [a mistake]. We hear on the audio that the assistant stated it was a purple card offence and the referee takes that recommendation.

The contact is excessive however Fernandes slips first. It is not an try on the ball however from the assistants’ view it appears like studs go in – however it’s a slight error. There isn’t any driving the foot into the opponent, it is extra of a tripping motion. VAR ought to have despatched the referee to the display screen.

Ought to Palace have been awarded a penalty vs Liverpool?

INCIDENT: Crystal Palace defender Marc Guehi thought he ought to have had a penalty after taking place beneath Virgil van Dijk’s tug again throughout Liverpool’s 1-0 win at Selhurst Park on October 5. VAR selected to not intervene.

WHAT THE OFFICIALS SAID:

VAR: There is a small maintain by 4 on him however it has no impression, he’s by no means attending to the ball.

WEBB’S VERDICT: It was fast and we attempt to be environment friendly. Delays have been decreased considerably this 12 months.

VAR checks the Van Dijk motion on Guehi, there’s contact between the gamers. We search for impactful contact that’s sustained. The motion from Van Dijk is fast and the ball was all the time going to the goalkeeper. We do not suppose the motion impacts Guehi’s potential to get the ball.

Sluggish movement can distort actuality. When it comes to drive or sustained holding, you must have a look at it in full velocity. It is one other one which break up opinion. The place subjectivity exists, we depart it with the referee’s choice. If he gave a penalty, we’d have left it.

Have been Newcastle proper to get a penalty vs Man Metropolis?

INCIDENT: Anthony Gordon went down beneath Man Metropolis goalkeeper Ederson’s problem with Newcastle trailing 1-0 to the Premier League champions. Referee Jared Gillett pointed to the spot and VAR agreed the choice, leaving Gordon to attain Newcastle’s equaliser as the sport ended 1-1.

WHAT THE OFFICIALS SAID:

VAR: Doable pen. Delay, delay. Comfortable it is a pen. Proper-back performs him onside and penalty is right.

REF: Yellow card for Ederson as real try for the ball.

WEBB’S VERDICT: It might go both approach. The goalkeeper is asking for bother and there’s definitely contact. Gordon would not search the contact however perhaps he lets it occur. He is shifting at tempo. If he didn’t give it, it will have been referee’s name. Contact is minimal.

Ought to Everton have been given a spot kick vs Newcastle?

INCIDENT: Dominic Calvert-Lewin went down beneath Dan Burn’s problem throughout Everton’s 0-0 draw with Newcastle on October 5. Referee Craig Pawson waved away the claims and after a evaluate, VAR agreed with the choice.

WHAT THE OFFICIALS SAID:

REF: No. Not for me, not for me. There is a problem between two of them, not for me.

VAR: Will get his foot in entrance, he kicks him. It is not a penalty. That isn’t a penalty. The attacker kicks the again of the defender.

WEBB’S VERDICT: I heard the combo of the opinions. I do not suppose it is a penalty, it is a good on-field choice. Nick Pope makes a save and Dan Burn strikes in a straight line, in entrance of [Dominic] Calvert-Lewin. He makes contact from behind and it is a regular coming collectively.

It was a very good judgement by on-field officers and VAR. There is no such thing as a offence by Burn.

Fulham penalty at Forest, Havertz purpose vs Leicester – watch extra Mic’d Up!

FULHAM – WHAT THE OFFICIALS SAID: Looking for an angle of the contact. He clearly stands on the again of his Achilles. The ball goes to go to him, it is an accident however he has impeded his opponent. He has clearly impeded the opponent and the referee has no view of it.

ARSENAL – WHAT THE OFFICIALS SAID: Does Sterling play the ball? On-field choice is offside. Wait, it is going to be checked. The defender performs it to Havertz however we’re simply checking the remainder. He is clearly on. I like to recommend you permit the purpose.

Watch Match Officers: Mic’d Up on Sky Sports activities Premier League on Tuesday at 7pm, and make amends for SkySports.com, the Sky Sports activities App and Sky Sports activities social channels.