A doc the Division of Well being and Human Companies despatched to lawmakers to assist Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s choice to vary U.S. coverage on covid vaccines cites scientific research which might be unpublished or beneath dispute and mischaracterizes others.
One well being skilled referred to as the doc “willful medical disinformation” in regards to the security of covid vaccines for kids and pregnant girls.
“It is so far out of left field that I find it insulting to our members of Congress that they would actually give them something like this. Congress members are relying on these agencies to provide them with valid information, and it’s just not there,” stated Mark Turrentine, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Baylor Faculty of Drugs.
Kennedy, who was an anti-vaccine activist earlier than taking a job within the Trump administration, introduced Might 27 that the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention would not suggest covid vaccines for pregnant girls or wholesome youngsters, bypassing the company’s formal course of for adjusting its vaccine schedules for adults and children. The announcement, made on the social platform X, has been met with outrage by many pediatricians and scientists.
The HHS doc meant to assist Kennedy’s choice, obtained by KFF Well being Information, was despatched to members of Congress who questioned the science and course of behind his transfer, in line with one federal official who requested to not be recognized as a result of he wasn’t approved to debate the matter publicly.
The doc has not been posted on the HHS web site, although it’s the first detailed clarification of Kennedy’s announcement from the company.
Titled “Covid Recommendation FAQ,” the doc distorts some reliable research and cites others which might be disputed and unpublished, medical specialists say.
HHS director of communications Andrew Nixon instructed KFF Well being Information, “There is no distortion of the studies in this document. The underlying data speaks for itself, and it raises legitimate safety concerns. HHS will not ignore that evidence or downplay it. We will follow the data and the science.”
HHS didn’t reply to a request to call the writer of the doc.
One of many research the HHS doc cites is beneath investigation by its writer concerning “potential issues with the research methodology and conclusions and author conflicts of interest,” in line with a hyperlink on the examine’s webpage.
“This is RFK Jr.’s playbook,” stated Sean O’Leary, chair of the Committee on Infectious Illnesses for the American Academy of Pediatrics and an assistant professor of pediatrics on the College of Colorado Faculty of Drugs. “Either cherry-pick from good science or take junk science to support his premise — this has been his playbook for 20 years.”
One other examine cited within the doc is a preprint that has not been peer-reviewed. Below the examine’s title is an alert that “it reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.” Although the preprint was made out there a yr in the past, it has not been revealed in a peer-reviewed journal.
The FAQ supporting Kennedy’s choice claims that “post-marketing studies” of covid vaccines have recognized “serious adverse effects, such as an increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis” — situations during which the center’s muscle or its overlaying, the pericardium, undergo irritation.
False claims that the 2024 preprint confirmed myocarditis and pericarditis solely in individuals who acquired a covid vaccine, and never in folks contaminated with covid, circulated on social media. One of many examine’s co-authors publicly rejected that concept, as a result of the examine didn’t examine outcomes between individuals who had been vaccinated and people contaminated with the covid virus. The examine additionally targeted solely on youngsters and adolescents. The HHS doc omitted quite a few different peer-reviewed research which have proven that the chance of myocarditis and pericarditis is bigger after contracting covid for each vaccinated and non-vaccinated folks than the chance of the identical issues after vaccination alone.
O’Leary stated that whereas some instances of myocarditis had been reported in vaccinated adolescent boys and younger males early within the covid pandemic, the charges declined after the 2 preliminary doses of covid vaccines had been spaced additional aside.
Now, adolescents and adults who haven’t been beforehand vaccinated obtain just one shot, and myocarditis not reveals up within the knowledge, O’Leary stated, referring to the CDC’s Vaccine Security Datalink. “There is no increased risk at this point that we can identify,” he stated.
In two cases, the HHS memo makes claims which might be actively refuted by the papers it cites to again them up. Each papers assist the protection and effectiveness of covid vaccines for pregnant girls.
The HHS doc says that one other paper it cites discovered “an increase in placental blood clotting in pregnant mothers who took the vaccine.” However the paper doesn’t comprise any reference to placental blood clots or to pregnant girls.
“I’ve now read it three times. And I cannot find that anywhere,” stated Turrentine, the OB-GYN professor.
If he had been grading the HHS doc, “I would give this an ‘F,’” Turrentine stated. “This is not supported by anything and it’s not using medical evidence.”
Whereas members of Congress who’re physicians ought to know to test references within the paper, they could not take the time to take action, stated Neil Silverman, a professor of medical obstetrics and gynecology who directs the Infectious Illnesses in Being pregnant Program on the David Geffen Faculty of Drugs at UCLA. “They’re going to assume this is coming from a scientific agency. So they are being hoodwinked along with everyone else who has had access to this document,” Silverman stated.
The workplaces of three Republicans in Congress who’re medical medical doctors serving on Home and Senate committees targeted on well being, together with Sen. Invoice Cassidy (R-La.), didn’t reply to requests for remark about whether or not they acquired the memo. Emily Druckman, communications director for Rep. Kim Schrier (D-Wash.), a doctor serving on the Home Vitality and Commerce Committee, confirmed that Schrier’s workplace did obtain a duplicate of the doc.
“The problem is a lot of legislators and even their staffers, they don’t have the expertise to be able to pick those references apart,” O’Leary stated. “But this one — I’ve seen much better anti-vaccine propaganda than this, frankly.”
C.J. Younger, deputy communications director for the Home Vitality and Commerce Committee, confirmed that Democratic workers members of the committee acquired the doc from HHS. Prior to now, he stated, comparable paperwork would assist make clear the justification and scope of an administration’s coverage change and may very well be assumed to be scientifically correct, Younger stated.
“This feels like it’s breaking new ground. I don’t think that we saw this level of sloppiness or inattention to detail or lack of consideration for scientific merit under the first Trump administration,” Younger stated.
On June 4, Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) and Schrier launched a invoice that might require Kennedy to undertake official vaccine choices from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP. Younger stated the motivation behind the invoice was Kennedy’s choice to vary the covid vaccine schedule with out the enter of ACIP’s vaccine specialists, who play a key position in setting CDC insurance policies round vaccine schedules and entry.
Kennedy introduced June 9 on X that he would take away all 17 members of ACIP, citing alleged conflicts of curiosity he didn’t element, and exchange them. He introduced eight replacements June 11, together with individuals who had criticized vaccine mandates in the course of the covid pandemic.
We’d like to talk with present and former personnel from the Division of Well being and Human Companies or its element businesses who consider the general public ought to perceive the influence of what’s taking place throughout the federal well being paperwork. Please message KFF Well being Information on Sign at (415) 519-8778 or get in contact right here.
