Ex-JPMorgan Banker
John Doe’s Dad Defends Son’s Harassment Swimsuit
Towards Feminine Boss
Printed
The dad of the ex-JPMorgan Chase banker who sued his feminine boss is standing by his son amid scandalous allegations.
Final week, the senior VP — recognized solely as John Doe within the go well with — accused Lorna Hajdini of allegedly drugging him and pressuring him into “non-consensual and humiliating sex acts.”
On Sunday, the plaintiff’s dad informed The New York Publish that he did not know something about his son’s lawsuit, saying … “He didn’t talk with us or anything.”
However he careworn that he nonetheless has his again, including … “He’s my son. He’s a good guy.”
Within the lawsuit, Doe claims Hajdini slipped him “roofies” — the date rape drug — and allegedly pressured him to have intercourse whereas she scolded him and made him cry.
The go well with additionally claims Hajdini would name him issues like “little Arab boy toy” and “little brown boy” whereas partaking in undesirable exercise.
Doe says within the go well with that, in a single occasion, Hajdini allegedly provided him a “Birthday BJ” … and claims that she grabbed his junk in one other.
The lawsuit additionally alleges that Hajdini informed Doe she owned him and threatened to “ruin” him if he did not have intercourse along with her.
Hajdini “categorically denies” the allegations, and her attorneys beforehand informed TMZ … “She never engaged in any inappropriate conduct with this individual of any kind and has never even been to the location where the alleged sexual assault supposedly took place.”
A spokesperson for JPMorgan additionally informed us final week that they performed an investigation they usually “don’t believe there’s any merit” to Doe’s claims.
The spokesperson informed TMZ … “While numerous employees cooperated with the investigation, the complainant refused to participate and has declined to provide facts that would be central to support his allegations.”
On Friday, a courtroom consultant informed Individuals that Doe’s lawsuit had been “returned for correction” … but it surely’s unclear what corrections will likely be made and when it will be re-filed, if in any respect.
