It’s not all Trump’s fault

Good morning. The massive market information over the weekend, if you wish to name it that, was a Trump social media publish reaffirming the president’s dedication to a strategic cryptocurrency reserve, which despatched crypto costs flying. The thought is so silly and mistaken that Unhedged is not going to dignify it with remark. E mail me about one thing else: robert.armstrong@ft.com.

The ‘it’s all Trump’s fault’ narrative 

Unhedged wrote final week in regards to the “vibe shift”: a set of sentiment readings, market management adjustments, and weak financial knowledge that collectively recommend that one thing basic has modified in markets and the economic system, and never for the higher.

The consensus view is that the vibe shift has been attributable to the Trump administration. That the market narrative would coalesce round this concept makes psychological sense. Trump’s move-fast-and-break-things coverage agenda has dominated the information whereas the vibe shift has unfolded; it’s pure to attract a causal hyperlink between the 2. We ought to be cautious, although. The best market narrative isn’t at all times the suitable one, and focusing an excessive amount of on the coverage backdrop, nonetheless revolutionary, can obscure different elements of the image. 

The cost sheet towards the administration has three primary elements:

Coverage uncertainty and coverage sequencing are crushing sentiment. Latest sentiment survey outcomes from the College of Michigan and the Convention Board confirmed notable declines, and respondents to each surveys singled out tariff coverage and inflation as causes of concern. Analysts have additionally pointed to the Baker, Bloom, Davis index of financial coverage uncertainty as proof that the administration’s abrupt and aggressive strategy to coverage is wrecking the temper. The BDM index tracks media protection, impending adjustments in tax coverage, and the dispersion of financial forecasts. It has solely ever been larger at first of the Covid pandemic:

A part of the issue is that, in a reversal of the primary Trump administration, market-unfriendly tariff and immigration polices have been the early precedence, whereas market-friendly tax cuts and deregulation have been deferred. Right here is Pimco economist Tiffany Wilding:

We predict the preliminary reactions within the markets [to Trump’s election] — just like these seen within the sentiment surveys — probably mirror better give attention to anticipated pro-growth insurance policies, such because the potential for extra near-term tax cuts and deregulation. Nevertheless, the bulletins since Trump’s inauguration have been extra targeted on doubtlessly disruptive commerce and immigration coverage actions and steeper cuts in authorities companies . . . Markets is perhaps catching on to the shifting steadiness of dangers

One bond supervisor summed it up extra concisely: “The backdrop is becoming increasingly simple: most of the policy actions and proposals out of Washington are growth negative.” 

Sentiment is weighing on exercise. The newest (however hardly the solely) proof of an financial slowdown got here on Friday, when the federal government’s private consumption expenditure report confirmed inflation-adjusted client spending falling by 0.5 per cent in January, led down by sturdy items and particularly vehicles. Providers spending softened, too, whereas the financial savings charge rose. It’s the worst studying in since 2021:

Right here is Barclays economist Christian Keller:

Excessive uncertainty about tariffs, DOGE, finances deficits and a Ukraine peace deal has began to weigh on US exercise . . . Certainly, the latest knowledge recommend coverage is already having destructive spillovers . . . spending and commerce knowledge and expectations for a further drag from uncertainty lead us to revise down our GDP forecasts for Q1 (-1.0pp) and Q2 (-0.5pp) to 1.5 per cent q/q . . . we nonetheless assume that this quantities to extra of a slowdown than a recession, however it’s a important deceleration from the expansion charges of the previous two years.

The view that we’re seeing an coverage uncertainty-driven slowdown suits with what now we have seen within the bond market. Since Treasury yields peaked in January, their decline is nearly all right down to falling actual charges — that are linked to development — somewhat than to declines in inflation expectations:

Lastly, uncertainty might weigh on funding, which might lower longer-term development. Torsten Slok of Apollo has gathered a variety of Fed surveys of firms’ capital expenditure plans. All have been rising for a couple of years, however all ticked down in February:

Slok argues that “DOGE and tariffs combined are a mild temporary shock to the economy that will put modest upward pressure on inflation and modest downward pressure on GDP.”

The “it’s Trump’s fault” speculation is logical in broad define however would possibly simply be taken too far. Trump’s most necessary trait is his skill to make folks emotional, and in markets coolness is all. So listed here are 4 factors to remember:

The economic system has been operating above its pattern development charge, and a slowdown isn’t any shock. The US isn’t, in the long term, a 2.5-3 per cent actual development economic system, however that’s what now we have had for the previous couple of years. Maybe Trump insurance policies made the step right down to a extra real looking 1-2 per cent development come sooner, however this was coming, particularly with the Fed’s coverage charge parked at 4.5 per cent.  

One month is only one month (particularly in January). Financial knowledge is lumpy. Chilly climate and fires in all probability has one thing to do with the most recent spending figures. And peculiar stuff occurs in January for no matter cause (take a look at January 2024 and 2023 within the PCE chart above). 

Even when the market is responding to the coverage onslaught, what is going on seems just like the reversal of the overhyped Trump trades of late final yr, somewhat than one thing deeper. The spherical journey taken by small cap shares — darlings of the “Trump will boost domestic growth” notion — exemplifies this:

Lastly, it’s price remembering that the largest sea-change available in the market — the latest underperformance of the Magnificent 7 massive tech shares — doesn’t appear to be a response to Trump coverage noise. If something, one would assume an unsure coverage backdrop would make these shares extra interesting, on condition that their development isn’t pushed by the financial cycle. As an alternative, their relative decline seems like a pure correction after an wild bull run, and the Magazine 7 aren’t the one a part of the market that has come to look overextended. There’s a greater query in markets than Trump: can US danger belongings return to one thing resembling normalcy after a number of years of astonishing post-pandemic exuberance?

Trump is an attention-attracting machine. However attributing an excessive amount of of what’s going on in markets and the economic system to the administration can be a mistake.

One good learn

A primary blue go well with.

FT Unhedged podcast

Can’t get sufficient of Unhedged? Take heed to our new podcast, for a 15-minute dive into the most recent markets information and monetary headlines, twice every week. Make amends for previous editions of the e-newsletter right here.