Police enter an immigration detention centre in Bangkok on Jan. 22.
Chanakarn Laosarakham/AFP through Getty Photographs
disguise caption
toggle caption
Chanakarn Laosarakham/AFP through Getty Photographs
Jeffrey Wasserstrom is chancellor’s professor of historical past at College of California, Irvine and the writer of The Milk Tea Alliance: Inside Asia’s Wrestle In opposition to Autocracy and Beijing, a brief e book about activists in and exiles from Thailand, Hong Kong and Myanmar that can be revealed in June by Columbia World Experiences.
Given how a lot the world has modified within the final decade, it is eerie how intently Thailand’s current actions towards sanctuary-seeking Uyghurs have paralleled these of 2015.
Some 300 members of the largely Muslim ethnic Uyghur neighborhood went to Thailand in 2014 to flee mistreatment by Chinese language authorities of their homeland of Xinjiang, a territory within the northwestern nook of China. In July 2015, the Thai authorities despatched 109 of them again to China. They did so though Uyghurs and lots of human rights teams insisted that the Chinese language authorities would deal with them brutally. The motion drew worldwide condemnation.
Final month, in a transfer able to triggering déjà vu, there was a replay of that state of affairs. This time, Thailand deported 40 Uyghurs to China, once more garnering criticism from different nations, together with the USA.
The U.S., Canada and different nations say that they had supplied to take the refugees in, in keeping with information experiences this week. However Thailand’s deputy overseas minister stated his nation “could face retaliation from China” if it despatched the Uyghurs to 3rd nations as an alternative.
There may be overwhelming proof, albeit disputed by the Chinese language authorities, that Chinese language President Xi Jinping’s authorities has been engaged in a scientific marketing campaign of persecution of Uyghurs and different ethnic minorities — deploying harsh measures that embody the mass incarceration of residents in a big community of extralegal detention camps. The U.S. State Division has labeled China’s persecution of Uyghurs and different ethnic minorities as genocide and crimes towards humanity.
It’s hanging, regardless of essential shifts in Thailand over the previous decade, how deeply the similarities run between the conditions in 2015 and 2025.
The Thai authorities then, as now, defended their motion by saying it conformed to worldwide legislation. In addition they insisted that they believed Beijing’s assertion that the returnees could be handled pretty.
In 2015, the Thai authorities that accepted the deportation was a newly ensconced one. The motion was extensively seen as an indication that the federal government of Thailand — an in depth ally of the U.S. in the course of the Chilly Struggle — would proceed to maneuver nearer to China, as deporting the Uyghurs was bowing to strain from Beijing.
All of this is applicable to the state of affairs right this moment.
There are some political variations, although, within the context across the two episodes. In 2015, the federal government was run by a junta, and the particular person defending the deportation of Uyghurs was a army man who had seized energy in a coup in Might 2014.
The particular person defending the deportation of Uyghurs in 2025, in contrast, is Thailand’s feminine prime minister, Paetongtarn Shinawatra. She heads a political social gathering that obtained numerous votes within the final nationwide election, in Might 2023.

Thailand’s new prime minister, Paetongtarn Shinawatra, talks to journalists after receiving a royal letter of endorsement for the publish on the Pheu Thai social gathering headquarters in Bangkok, Thailand, Aug. 18, 2024.
Sakchai Lalit/AP
disguise caption
toggle caption
Sakchai Lalit/AP
Prime Minister Shinawatra shouldn’t be, nonetheless, from the Transfer Ahead Celebration, which did better of all within the 2023 election. The pinnacle of Transfer Ahead, Pita Limjaroenrat, was not allowed to turn into prime minister as chief of a reform-minded coalition as briefly appeared doable after the votes have been tallied. As an alternative, he has been banned from politics for a decade, and Transfer Ahead was compelled to disband by a court docket decided to defend many points of the political established order.
The brand new prime minister’s Pheu Thai Celebration — based by her billionaire father, former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra — got here in second within the election. She leads a coalition that, just like the junta in energy in 2015 did, enjoys royal help, and it contains events tied to members of the outdated junta. The story of home politics is certainly one of continuity in addition to shifts.
Putting a pair of statements excerpted from Freedom Home annual experiences from the center of the 2010s and the center of the 2020s facet by facet can underscore this level neatly.
“Thailand’s … status declined from Partly Free to Not Free due to the May military coup, whose leaders abolished the 2007 constitution and imposed severe restrictions on speech and assembly,” the Freedom within the World 2015 report stated.
“Thailand’s status declined from Partly Free to Not Free because the leading opposition party was dissolved by the Constitutional court,” in keeping with the 2025 version.
One particular persevering with side is said to how the Thai authorities search to silence outspoken critics or drive them into exile. The long-standing lèse-majesté legal guidelines, which criminalizes criticism of the monarchy, remains to be used to intimidate and punish activists, making a mockery of any notion that Thailand is a land the place speech rights are protected.
But Thais have periodically pushed for larger freedoms. In a dramatic protest motion in 2020 and 2021, younger individuals led demonstrations calling for the junta chief behind the 2014 coup to step down after greater than half a decade in energy; for reform and fewer arbitrary use of the lèse-majesté legal guidelines; and for social adjustments such because the legalization of same-sex marriage. Some veterans of the motion have been elected to parliament with the Transfer Ahead social gathering in Might 2023, however a number of have confronted lèse-majesté fees in court docket already or have them hanging over their heads now. One extensively admired determine from that wrestle, human rights lawyer Arnon Nampa, was sentenced to 4 years in jail on such fees in September 2023.

Thai protesters cheer throughout a pro-democracy rally on the Pathumwan Intersection on Feb. 10, 2021, in Bangkok, Thailand. Protesters descended on a shopping center in central Bangkok to stage a “make noise” marketing campaign.
Lauren DeCicca/Getty Photographs
disguise caption
toggle caption
Lauren DeCicca/Getty Photographs
On the top of the 2020-2021 protest motion, the most important wrestle of its sort within the nation this century, it appeared as if Thailand may be poised to start out a daring new chapter in its historical past. Within the rapid wake of the 2023 election, this sense was even stronger for a time.
As an alternative, headlines from the nation over the last half-year illustrate that there have been some notable strikes into novel terrain, however troubling outdated limitations on freedom proceed and a few disturbing patterns from the previous recur.
On the facet of change, earlier this 12 months Thailand grew to become the primary Southeast Asian nation to legalize same-sex marriage. On the facet of continuity, late final 12 months, information got here that Arnon Nampa had been convicted, whereas already incarcerated, of added lèse-majesté fees, in order that his whole mixed sentences come to a staggering whole of shut to twenty years.
On the facet of disturbing patterns from the previous, there’s the deportation of the Uyghurs. This can be a signal that the brand new civilian authorities in Bangkok, just like the junta that got here earlier than it, is keen to take acquainted sorts of actions towards not simply home critics, but additionally these in search of security from the federal government of the highly effective, autocratic neighbor to the north, whose favor Thailand’s ruling elite, in every of its current configurations, has proven itself wanting to court docket.