This text is an on-site model of our Unhedged e-newsletter. Premium subscribers can enroll right here to get the e-newsletter delivered each weekday. Commonplace subscribers can improve to Premium right here, or discover all FT newsletters
Good morning. Yesterday was tough. It started with the ISM manufacturing survey for February, which confirmed new orders falling into contraction after three months of enlargement. This was “likely . . . the beginning of the end of the recent mini renaissance” in US manufacturing, Thomas Ryan of Capital Economics summed up. Later within the day, President Donald Trump confirmed the nation will, as threatened, put heavy tariffs on Mexico and Canada right now, with “no room” for negotiation. Inventory indices turned down instantly; each brief and lengthy Treasuries rallied. At Unhedged, we strive to not get too consumed by a single month’s knowledge. However this month has, we should admit, been a doozy. E mail us some excellent news: robert.armstrong@ft.com and aiden.reiter@ft.com.
Tariffs
The market had been hoping Trump was bluffing about tariffs on Mexico and Canada. It seems he was not. Yesterday, he insisted the 25 per cent tariffs will begin right now, alongside a ten per cent soar in tariffs on China. The S&P 500 fell 1.8 per cent, and the Russell 2000 small-cap index fell 2.8 per cent. Gold rose sharply.
What’s it about tariffs the market so dislikes? The place precisely will the injury be? It’s surprisingly tough to say exactly.
A part of it’s merely the assumption that tariffs will cut back general financial development. The Tax Basis estimates US tariffs on Mexico and Canada may decrease long-run actual GDP development by as a lot as 0.4 per cent. In keeping with the Brookings Establishment, that quantity could possibly be greater, relying on how Mexico and Canada retaliate.
The truth, we anticipate, is worse than this. Although forecasting Trump’s behaviour is a mug’s recreation — he appears to equate unpredictability with energy and leverage — it’s tough to think about he would put 25 per cent tariffs on Canada and Mexico and never do the identical to the EU, which he actually hates. And collectively, the EU, Mexico, and Canada made up practically two-thirds of all US items imports, which got here to about $3tn in 2024. The modifications coming to import-heavy sectors equivalent to automobiles and chemical substances could possibly be important:
Shifting past the final influence on mixture development, it’s exhausting to say precisely what the influence on company earnings will likely be. Among the variables to estimate: how a lot do different nations reply? For every product, how a lot of the tariff are exporters to the US ready to soak up, and the way a lot will they move on? How value elastic will demand for the merchandise show to be? How available are home substitutes? Even the businesses concerned wrestle to estimate what the web influence on revenues and margins will likely be.
This uncertainty was mirrored in yesterday’s inventory sell-off. On the sector stage, it didn’t appear to be traders had been fleeing importers specifically; as an alternative, they had been fleeing threat basically.

Defensives rose, as did actual property (which is helped by falling charges) and cyclicals fell. In the meantime the most important loser was tech. Sure, the Large Tech corporations equivalent to Nvidia are international. However extra so than, say, huge industrials or supplies corporations? A extra believable rationalization is that tech has had an ideal run and appears costly, so promoting was a great way for portfolio managers to deliver down threat (the vitality sell-off seemingly has extra to do with Opec manufacturing will increase than tariffs).
There have been some tariff-driven winners and losers, in fact: heavy importers together with Greenback Tree fell exhausting. Weyerhaeuser, the timber producer that can now be competing towards tariffed Canadian logs, rose sharply. However for essentially the most half the most important gainers are traditional defensives, equivalent to Hershey and Campbell’s and the large losers (outdoors of vitality) had been tech corporations.
One of many customary clichés concerning the Trump administration is that it will likely be restrained by markets. As tariffs coverage lastly strikes from rhetoric to actuality, that concept will likely be put to the take a look at.
Earnings development: the final finest information
This text has in current days changed into a dreary litany of market and financial knowledge collection which can be turning south. However there may be one collection that has turned up not too long ago, and decisively: S&P 500 earnings. With nearly each firm reporting, earnings for the index has risen by a fats 18 per cent yr over yr — way more than analysts had anticipated — the most important achieve for the reason that post-Covid bounce of 2021.
A benign financial backdrop absolutely helped, however the huge achieve is basically a margin story. Revenues for the index expanded by a way more regular 5 per cent, about as anticipated, in response to FactSet. Internet margins expanded by 1.3 share factors over the identical quarter final yr, to 12.6 per cent.
Because the financial system slows worries set in, sturdy earnings development is nice and necessary information. Earnings assist inventory costs, inventory costs assist sentiment, and sentiment helps the financial system.
There’s nonetheless, one wrinkle to the story: as earnings for the fourth quarter of 2024 have are available in stronger than anticipated, estimates for 2025 earnings have edged down. Scott Chronert of Citi revealed this wonderful desk exhibiting the change for the reason that begin of the yr in fourth quarter ‘24 and full-year ‘25 estimates:

Notice how the cyclical stocks, particularly materials, are leading the expectations cuts for ‘25 — and the fact that financials is the only sector that has seen expectations improve, and only by a bit. These estimates will have been informed largely by the expectations set by company leadership in earnings calls with analysts. The tone of those calls has been understandably cautious, given the policy unknowns and the slowing economy, and the fact that companies like to under-promise and over-deliver. This contrast between strong performance and a worried outlook neatly sums up where markets are right now.
One Good Read
FT Unhedged podcast

Can’t get sufficient of Unhedged? Take heed to our new podcast, for a 15-minute dive into the most recent markets information and monetary headlines, twice every week. Atone for previous editions of the e-newsletter right here.
Beneficial newsletters for you
Due Diligence — Prime tales from the world of company finance. Enroll right here
Free Lunch — Your information to the worldwide financial coverage debate. Enroll right here