HELENA, Mont. — A final-minute change to a 2019 invoice put an finish date on Montana’s Medicaid enlargement program, setting the stage for what’s anticipated to be probably the most important well being care debate of the 2025 Montana Legislature.
In current interviews, legislative leaders predicted a vigorous debate over retaining the Medicaid enlargement program, which pays the medical payments of greater than 75,000 low-income Montanans at an annual value of about $1 billion to the federal and state governments. In addition they count on the subject to seep into different well being coverage choices, such because the approval of recent spending on Montana’s behavioral well being system and regulation of hospital tax-exempt standing.
“It all kind of links together,” mentioned state Sen. Dennis Lenz, a Billings Republican and chair of the Senate Public Well being, Welfare, and Security Committee.
Legislators from each events additionally count on lawmakers from the GOP majority to proceed to pursue abortion restrictions, regardless of a November statewide vote making abortion a proper below the Montana Structure.
The Medicaid enlargement debate, nevertheless, looms largest among the many well being care subjects.
“This is definitely the elephant in the room, so to speak,” mentioned Senate Minority Chief Pat Flowers, a Belgrade Democrat.
Montana expanded Medicaid, initially for 4 years, in 2015, by means of a coalition of minority Democrats, some reasonable Republicans, and a Democratic governor. The same coalition renewed this system in 2019, however on the final second, Senate Republicans tacked on an finish date of June 30, 2025. That put the matter within the lap of this yr’s legislature.
Republicans nonetheless maintain sturdy majorities within the state Home and Senate, whose leaders voiced issues concerning the enlargement program.
This time round, the governor — Greg Gianforte — is a Republican. Final yr, the Gianforte administration accomplished a postpandemic eligibility reassessment that lower the variety of enlargement enrollees from a excessive of 125,000 folks in April and Could 2023 to roughly 76,600 folks as of October, the latest knowledge accessible.
Gianforte has included funding for Medicaid enlargement in his proposed funds, which have to be permitted by the legislature to take impact. His workplace mentioned he desires “strong work requirements for able-bodied adults without dependents” to participate in this system. Spokesperson Kaitlin Worth mentioned the governor “has been clear that the safety net of Medicaid should be there for those who truly need it, but that it will collapse if all are allowed to climb on it.”
GOP legislative leaders clearly are skeptical of this system, saying it received’t proceed with out some “sideboards,” or further necessities of enrollees and suppliers.
Whether or not any enlargement invoice passes “will depend on the people pushing it,” mentioned Senate President Matt Regier, a Kalispell Republican who opposes enlargement. “If there is no give-and-take, it could be an interesting vote.”
Flowers mentioned he is aware of getting Medicaid enlargement by means of the Senate will likely be powerful. Republicans maintain a 32-18 majority, and the GOP caucus leans conservative.
“There are a lot of my colleagues on the Republican side that are ideologically opposed, and I think you’re going to see that in their consistent voting against reauthorizing,” Flowers mentioned.
Medicaid, funded by each the state and federal governments, gives well being protection for sure teams of low-income folks. Growth prolonged Medicaid protection to nondisabled adults ages 19 to 64 with incomes as much as 138% of the federal poverty degree — about $20,800 a yr for a person in 2024.
The 2010 federal Inexpensive Care Act opened Medicaid to this new group of adults, beginning in 2014. However a 2012 U.S. Supreme Courtroom ruling mentioned states may select whether or not to undertake the change, and 40 have finished so.
Republican state Rep. Ed Buttrey mentioned he would sponsor a invoice to reauthorize Medicaid enlargement with out an expiration date, however many GOP lawmakers stay unconvinced that enlargement is required, viewing it as a expensive, pointless welfare program.
“I understand there are some pros to Medicaid expansion, but, as a conservative, I do have issues with — I guess I can’t get around it — socialized medicine,” mentioned Home Speaker Brandon Ler (R-Savage).
In September, representatives from a pair of conservative-funded assume tanks made a case for ending Medicaid enlargement, saying its enrollment and prices are bloated. The consulting agency Manatt, then again, mentioned extra folks have entry to important remedy due to Medicaid enlargement.
As a minimum, it seems many Republicans need to require individuals to work, pay premiums, or meet different circumstances, if this system is to proceed.
Premiums and work necessities are in Montana’s regulation proper now. The Biden administration, although, nixed each, so that they haven’t been in impact. Montana Republicans count on the incoming Trump administration to be extra open to such provisions.
Democrats say Medicaid enlargement has succeeded on many fronts: masking 1000’s of low-income employees, serving to maintain rural well being care suppliers and hospitals afloat, and bringing lots of of tens of millions of federal {dollars} into Montana’s economic system. The state pays 10% of this system’s prices, which totaled about $962.4 million in fiscal yr 2024. The federal authorities picked up $870 million of that tab.
“With all that, it’s just stunning to me that there could be opposition,” Flowers mentioned. “There is just no reason for us, collectively as a state, not to support this.”
Democrats may have their very own enlargement invoice, introduced by Rep. Mary Caferro of Helena. She mentioned the invoice would take away the work necessities and premiums, shine extra gentle on the contracting actions of the state well being division, and reopen some public help workplaces which have been closed. It additionally would make enlargement everlasting.
“We’re 10 years into this program,” mentioned Rep. SJ Howell of Missoula, the Democratic vice chair of the Home Human Providers Committee, which debates well being coverage laws. “I think that continuing a cycle of uncertainty for patients and providers doesn’t make sense.”
Legislators additionally see the enlargement debate tying into different well being care discussions.
Regier and Lenz mentioned Montana’s nonprofit hospitals — sturdy supporters of enlargement — have benefited vastly from this system and might have to offer one thing again in return. One risk: extra authorities oversight of the “community benefits” that hospitals should present to obtain tax-exempt standing.
In addition they famous that Montanans pay a payment for hospital stays to assist the Medicaid program and {that a} payment on hospital outpatient income helps pay the prices of Medicaid enlargement. These charges and the ensuing cash raised for hospitals could advantage assessment, they mentioned.
In the meantime, backers mentioned Medicaid enlargement underpins one of many governor’s main coverage priorities, to enhance the state’s behavioral well being system. Gianforte has proposed spending as much as $100 million over the subsequent two years on 10 suggestions made by an advisory fee that reviewed the system for the previous 18 months.
If Medicaid enlargement ends, many adults would lose entry to the psychological well being and habit remedy system that Gianforte desires to enhance, advocates mentioned, whereas remedy suppliers would lose a major income.
Money for the behavioral well being adjustments would come, partly, from a $300 million fund created by the 2023 legislature. Lawmakers plan to scrutinize Gianforte’s proposals throughout the budgeting course of. Howell mentioned Democrats need to have a look at whether or not the adjustments would use sufficient of the $300 million fund shortly sufficient and on probably the most urgent wants.
In the meantime, Republicans mentioned they’ll doubtless introduce payments on abortion — regardless that Montanans permitted Constitutional Initiative 128 by a 58-42 margin in November. CI-128 mentioned the suitable to an abortion can’t be “denied or burdened” besides by a “compelling government interest achieved by the least restrictive means.”
“It’s not going to slow us down in our pro-life positions,” Ler mentioned of CI-128.
At a minimal, GOP leaders mentioned, a few of CI-128’s phrases ought to be outlined.
“With a very poorly written ballot initiative like that, we need to say, ‘What does that abortion industry look like under CI-128 and what’s our role as a state?’” Regier mentioned.
However state Sen. Cora Neumann, a Bozeman Democrat on the Senate Public Well being, Welfare, and Security Committee, mentioned the CI-128 vote supplied a robust mandate for the suitable of privateness.
Enacting restrictions would result in “that slippery slope of what’s next, if we allow legislators to rule on what’s happening in the doctor’s office,” she mentioned. “What kind of can of worms could be opened to other invasions of privacy?”
