Ronnie Radke
Information Lawsuit Towards Alleged Impersonators …
Needed For Snapchat Subpoena!!!
Revealed
Ronnie Radke is taking his first steps towards determining who’s allegedly impersonating him on-line … submitting a lawsuit in an effort to subpoena Snapchat.
The singer and rapper filed a go well with in opposition to a number of John Does earlier this week … alleging that, since a minimum of April of final 12 months, a person he calls John Doe 1 has credibly impersonated him on Snapchat for “purposes of harming, intimidating, threatening and/or defrauding” others.
He is additionally suing John Doe 2 — who could or is probably not the identical individual as John Doe 1 — for allegedly impersonating him on Instagram with the identical purpose to defraud others.
Ronnie notes he does not know the identities of those alleged impersonators … which is why he is suing them underneath these fictitious names till he can work out who they’re.
We reached out to Ronnie … and, he tells us this is step one in his plan to subpoena Snapchat to get the metadata and IP handle he believes essential to show he by no means messaged anybody, together with Brittany Furlan.
Ronnie says he does not need cash … simply proof to clear his title and show he wasn’t hitting up Tommy Lee‘s spouse final 12 months.
TMZ.com
As you understand … Ronnie filed a non permanent restraining order in opposition to Furlan earlier this week — claiming she’s harassing him on-line and even confirmed up at his home.
Furlan admitted to being catfished by somebody pretending to be Ronnie final 12 months … however just lately modified her tune and claimed she was speaking to the true Ronnie — earlier than she allegedly contacted a few of Ronnie’s underage followers on-line and inspired them to come back ahead with alleged inappropriate experiences with the singer.
TMZ.com
Nev Schulman — former host of “Catfish” — revealed on “The TMZ Podcast” he believes Furlan’s model of occasions … although he finally apologized to Radke for wading into the subject with out seeing any proof.
