The Supreme Court docket’s refusal to listen to the enchantment signifies that the Texas legislation stays in place, delivering a win to election integrity advocates.
The U.S. Supreme Court docket has declined to listen to a authorized problem to a Texas legislation that requires voters below the age of 65 to offer justification to vote by mail, which means that the Democrat-aligned try and sharply increase “no-excuse” mail-in ballots within the Lone Star state has failed, with implications for different states.
Based on an April 22 order listing, the excessive court docket denied petition for a writ of certiorariin a case that stems from a federal lawsuit filed in 2020 on behalf of the Texas Democratic Occasion and several other voters who requested that Texas raise its age-based limitations on no-excuse mail-in voting.
Texas legislation solely permits people to vote by mail with no qualifying excuse, like illness, if they’re 65 years or older. Of their authentic grievance, which made its method via quite a few decrease courts earlier than ending up earlier than the Supreme Court docket, the petitioners alleged that the Texas voting legislation violates the twenty sixth Modification of the U.S. Structure, which prohibits denying the correct to vote because of age.
The Supreme Court docket’s refusal to listen to the enchantment signifies that the Texas legislation stays in place, delivering a win to election integrity advocates who argue that no-excuse mail-in voting is liable to fraud and makes elections much less safe.
On the similar time, the excessive court docket’s choice to disclaim certiorari is a setback for teams who see legal guidelines like Texas’s age-based limits on no-excuse mail-in ballots as “voter suppression” or an unfair try and impose boundaries to voting for sure teams, on this case youthful voters.
The excessive court docket’s choice to not hear the enchantment has broader implications, nonetheless, since six different states–Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Tennessee–have related legal guidelines on the books that permit older voters to request absentee poll with out having to offer any justification.
Public opinion in Texas over the difficulty of no-excuse mail-in voting is break up, in keeping with some polls.
Extra Particulars
Of their preliminary petition filed in 2020 on behalf of the Texas Democratic Occasion and a gaggle of voters amids the COVID-19 pandemic, the plaintiffs requested that Texas raise its age-based restrictions to no-excuse mail-in voting, citing public well being dangers associated to the outbreak.
A district court docket decide sided with the plaintiffs in Might 2020, briefly blocking the Texas legislation.
Led by Texas Lawyer Basic Ken Paxton, Texas officers then filed an enchantment with the fifth U.S. Circuit Court docket of Appeals, which paused the district court docket’s ruling whereas the enchantment performed out.
The plaintiffs then requested the U.S. Supreme Court docket to reimpose the district court docket’s choice to freeze enforcement of the age-based limits to no-excuse mail-in voting, or to take the case up for evaluation, however the excessive court docket rejected each requests.
In the end, the fifth Circuit voided the decrease court docket’s Might 2020 order in full. This led the plaintiffs to file an amended grievance within the district court docket, this time asserting different claims, together with ones of racial discrimination below Part 2 of the Voting Rights Act and arguing that the age limitations on mail-in ballots violated the Equal Safety Clause of the 14th and twenty sixth Amendments.
In a July 2022 order, the district court docket decide dismissed all the plaintiffs’ claims, main to a different enchantment earlier than the fifth Circuit, which finally affirmed the district court docket’s choice to dismiss.
The plaintiffs filed a petition for a writ of certiorari within the U.S. Supreme Court docket in December 2023, asking the excessive court docket to declare Texas’s age-based voting legislation unconstitutional.
The court docket declined to evaluation the plaintiffs’ enchantment, leaving Texas’s age restrictions in place and denying a bid to increase no-excuse mail-in voting within the Lone Star state.
The Epoch Instances has reached out to counsel for each petitioners and respondents with a request for touch upon the excessive court docket’s choice.
Election Integrity or Voter Suppression?
The Supreme Court docket ruling comes amid a broader battle between those that see election integrity efforts as “voter suppression” and those that consider that the safety of U.S. elections is simply too lax and must be tightened.
Based on a operating tally by the left-leaning Brennan Middle for Justice, expansive voting legal guidelines far outpaced restrictive ones in 2023.
At the least 53 expansive voting legal guidelines had been launched final yr in no less than 23 states, in comparison with 17 restrictive legal guidelines being handed in 14 states, suggesting that the election integrity motion is falling behind.
Amid issues over voter fraud, former Home Speaker Newt Gingrich just lately urged that to win the presidential election in November, Republicans have to outvote Democrats by a big margin.
“Everybody who wants an honest election should know that in the long run, we need the French model: Everybody votes on the same day, everybody has a photo ID, everybody’s accounted as a person,” Mr. Gingrich stated in a February interview on Fox Information.
“But until we get to that, if Republicans want to win this year, under the rules that exist this year, they need to outvote the Democrats by about 5 percent, which is a margin big enough that it can’t be stolen,” he stated.
Elsewhere, an election integrity monitor laid out over a dozen “critical” reforms that it believes are mandatory as a way to safe voter integrity within the 2024 election, together with outlawing ranked selection voting and non-citizen voting, consolidating election dates, requiring voter ID, and safeguarding susceptible mail ballots.
When you discovered this text fascinating, please contemplate supporting conventional journalism
Our first version was printed 25 years in the past from a basement in Atlanta. At this time, The Epoch Instances brings fact-based, award-winning journalism to hundreds of thousands of People.
Our journalists have been threatened, arrested, and assaulted, however our dedication to unbiased journalism has by no means wavered. This yr marks our twenty fifth yr of unbiased reporting, free from company and political affect.
That’s why you’re invited to a limited-time introductory supply — simply $1 per week — so you possibly can be part of hundreds of thousands already celebrating unbiased information.
