A flag with a watermelon, a logo of Palestinian id, is waved throughout the Pink Line for Gaza protest in Paris on July 8.
Henrique Campos/AFP by way of Getty Photos
cover caption
toggle caption
Henrique Campos/AFP by way of Getty Photos
France and the United Kingdom are among the many newest nations getting ready to formally acknowledge a state of Palestine — a transfer by two everlasting members of the U.N. Safety Council that might deepen their cut up with Israel and the USA over the 22-month struggle in Gaza. Canada this week additionally joined the refrain of countries which have lately signaled openness to recognizing Palestinian statehood.
The deliberate recognition, anticipated as early as September, may mark a turning level. Whereas France seems prepared to maneuver unconditionally, Britain and Canada have tied their resolution to actions by Israel or the Palestinian Authority, which governs components of the Israeli-occupied West Financial institution. The shift displays mounting world outrage over the humanitarian toll in Gaza, together with reviews of widespread hunger within the besieged territory.
Greater than 145 nations acknowledge a state of Palestine.
Mouin Rabbani, a nonresident senior fellow with the Center East Council on World Affairs analysis group, says the transfer — although largely symbolic — carries diplomatic weight. “When you have states with the significance and importance of France and Britain taking this measure, it does leave the sense of a dam breaking,” Rabbani says. “One can expect others to follow.”
The transfer additionally serves to “put a shot across the bow of Israel,” says Michael Lynk, a former U.N. unbiased skilled on human rights within the Palestinian territories. For the nations selecting to acknowledge a state of Palestine, it alerts to the world that they’re “annoyed, upset [and] distressed by Israel’s conduct of the war in Gaza.”
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has mentioned in a press release that recognizing a Palestinian state “rewards Hamas’s monstrous terrorism & punishes its victims.” U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio shared that sentiment in a publish on X final week that referred to as it a “reckless decision” that “only serves Hamas propaganda.” Palestinian Authority officers welcomed the bulletins by France and the U.Ok., whereas the BBC reported that Hamas referred to as France’s motion a “positive step.”
What precisely have France, the U.Ok. and Canada mentioned?
Paris, London and Ottawa have lengthy supported a two-state answer to resolve the long-running Israeli-Palestinian battle by establishing a Palestinian state, one thing that Palestinians say ought to embody the West Financial institution, Gaza and East Jerusalem. The leaders of the three nations have mentioned they intend to make an announcement at September’s U.N. Normal Meeting in New York. However they’re taking barely totally different approaches.
Final week, French President Emmanuel Macron, in a letter shared on X, assured Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas that France plans to acknowledge a Palestinian state. Macron referred to as for a right away ceasefire, the discharge of all hostages, “massive humanitarian aid to the people of Gaza,” making certain “the demilitarization of Hamas” and rebuilding a Palestinian state that totally acknowledges Israel.
U.Ok. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has outlined a September timeline for Britain’s recognition of a Palestinian state until Israel agrees to a ceasefire, halts the growth of Israeli settlements within the West Financial institution and commits to a two-state answer. His assertion additionally requires “the withdrawal of Israeli forces and the removal of Hamas leadership from Gaza as key steps towards a negotiated two-state solution.”
Canada has among the identical circumstances. In a information convention on Wednesday, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney mentioned his authorities’s transfer was aimed toward preserving a two-state answer “as the only road map for a secure and prosperous future.” Carney additionally mentioned that the Palestinian Authority, which has not held elections since 2006, should maintain a vote in 2026 that excludes Hamas.
Greater than 60,000 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces over the course of the struggle in Gaza, the Gaza Well being Ministry says. The struggle started with a Hamas-led assault in October 2023 that killed about 1,200 individuals in Israel, in keeping with Israel.
What are the sensible and diplomatic implications?

U.N. Safety Council members vote on a decision calling for a ceasefire and unrestricted humanitarian entry in Gaza, on the U.N. headquarters in New York Metropolis on June 4. Recognition of a Palestinian state by the U.Ok. and France may have implications for the Safety Council.
Leonardo Munoz/AFP by way of Getty Photos
cover caption
toggle caption
Leonardo Munoz/AFP by way of Getty Photos
If the U.Ok. and France acknowledge a Palestinian state, 4 out of the 5 everlasting members of the U.N. Safety Council — France, the U.Ok., Russia and China — will communicate with a single voice on the difficulty. “That means the United States is the only country … that refuses to budge from its kind of unconditional support for everything that Israel does,” in keeping with Khaled Elgindy, a visiting scholar at Georgetown College’s Middle for Up to date Arab Research.
Diplomatically, it implies that the recognizing nations may change full ambassadors with the Palestinian Authority, says Lynk, who’s at present an affiliate professor at Western College’s College of Regulation, in London, Ontario. “It would be raising the status of [Canada’s] representative office in Ramallah [in the West Bank] to a full embassy with an ambassador instead of a representative, and Palestine would have an ambassador and a full embassy in Ottawa.”
Most nations that do not at present have formal relations with the Palestinian Authority nonetheless have maintained casual ties by varied diplomatic, political and humanitarian channels.
“States that recognize Palestine … would have obligations … to take steps to protest and take action — actual sanctions if need be — against any state that’s interfering with Palestinian sovereignty,” Lynk says.
With France and Britain, it may imply two extra votes towards Israel on the U.N. Safety Council, however as Rabbani notes, “France and Britain have for decades not deployed their veto in defense of Israel.” As a substitute, they’ve allowed the USA to train its veto, he says. “So I don’t think anything is going to change in the Security Council.”
Lastly, there might be implications for the Worldwide Prison Courtroom (ICC), which issued warrants for the arrest of Netanyahu and former Israeli Protection Minister Yoav Gallant in November for “crimes against humanity and war crimes” dedicated because the begin of the Gaza battle. Netanyahu has referred to as the costs “outrageous” and the worldwide court docket an “enemy of humanity.”
Yaël Ronen, a senior analysis fellow on the Minerva Middle for Human Rights at Hebrew College, says the popularity “could have legal consequences … in the context of the ICC jurisdiction.”
Nevertheless, France has mentioned it might not arrest Netanyahu and Gallant as a result of it might be “incompatible with its obligations in terms of international law with regards to immunities granted to states which are not party to the ICC” — on this case Israel.
So, recognition of a Palestinian state “doesn’t mean that those states would necessarily arrest these politicians if they arrive on French or British soil,” Ronen says.
Rabbani provides: “We’ve seen this year that France has on multiple occasions permitted indicted war criminals, Israeli war criminals who are fugitives from international justice because they’re wanted by the ICC, to use French airspace on their way to the United States.”
France, Britain and Canada have all mentioned Hamas have to be sidelined from a future Palestinian state, however it’s not clear whether or not that’s potential.
Hamas, which controls Gaza and is separate from the Palestinian Authority, has relations with some Center East nations and enjoys restricted ties with Russia and China. However the European Union and most Western nations, together with the USA, Canada and Australia, have declared the Islamist group a terrorist group.
Why the sudden shift now?
“There’s a crisis. There’s a sense that something needs to be done to stop this. So you do whatever is possible. And if there’s nothing else, this is what you do,” Ronen says.
Public opinion additionally performs a job. Within the U.Ok., for instance, 45% of Britons now say that their authorities ought to acknowledge a Palestinian state, whereas solely 14% disagree, in keeping with a YouGov ballot performed final week.
For the nations shifting towards recognizing a state of Palestine, Israel’s actions have compelled their hand, says Rabbani. Former French Overseas Minister Hubert Védrine, chatting with Le Monde, mentioned Macron’s authorities had an obligation to do one thing. “Given the appalling situation in Gaza and the lack of prospects, it was becoming dishonorable to do nothing,” Védrine mentioned.
Rabbani additionally suspects that the nations in query are hoping to revive the opportunity of a two-state answer, which he describes as “a framework that is increasingly becoming an illusion.”
“They’ve been placed in an impossible situation by the Israeli government,” amid rising home political stress, he says.
In the long run, merely recognizing Palestinian statehood is a low-cost choice. It might placate a home viewers demanding motion, whereas doing little or no to truly change the scenario on the bottom, Rabbani says. And it is simpler than imposing actual sanctions on Israel, which the U.Ok., France and Canada haven’t proposed.
“In that sense, there’s a very large contradiction between words and action,” he says.