With tons of of tasks earlier than native planners, nondisclosure pacts and tax incentives are spurring suspicion amongst native residents.
From Georgia to Oregon, New England to New Mexico, knowledge middle tasks are drawing opposition in native authorities hearings by residents involved concerning the voracious demand for electrical energy, water consumption, and noise. Critics additionally argue that knowledge facilities don’t produce the roles different land makes use of generate.
In Texas, individuals in small cities query knowledge middle improvement within the broader context of speedy rural industrialization.
In Pennsylvania, advert hoc teams say knowledge facilities are tapping into close by pure fuel fields, rising the frequency of fracking, and straining water provides.
In Indiana, Minnesota, Kansas, Nebraska, and throughout the nation, residents say the size and proximity of those high-tech campuses degrade their neighborhoods and devalue properties.
Objections fluctuate, relying on proposal and web site, however a standard grievance is state and native governments providing knowledge middle tasks tax incentives which might be usually shielded from public scrutiny by nondisclosure agreements.
Corporations say these pacts protect proprietary company intelligence, however the perceived lack of transparency fosters suspicion and anger when residents understand native planners are set to approve a proposal they knew little to nothing about till it seemed to be a finished deal.
“Just from our experience, it seems like one of the big concerns is that, yeah, there is no community outreach,” Kamil Prepare dinner, Public Citizen’s Texas local weather and clear power affiliate, instructed the Epoch Occasions. “There’s no method by which the community can be informed in a way that actually makes it seem like their voice is valued and that they have a choice in these matters.”
A lot of this native opposition seems rooted within the grievance that folks “weren’t informed to begin with, were ignored at some point,” stated Joe Warnimont, who co-authored a February HostingAdvice.com survey. The survey of 800 individuals in 16 states discovered that 93 p.c agreed that “cutting-edge AI data centers are vital to the United States,” however solely 35 p.c need one of their city.
“The main insights are there is clearly a disconnect between what the local residents experience and what is being sold to these communities from developers,” Warnimont instructed The Epoch Occasions.
Shield PT govt director Gillian Graber stated her western Pennsylvania nonprofit had no concept that planners in Westmoreland County’s Higher Burrell township have been contemplating TECfusions’ bid to construct a knowledge middle at a former Alcoa web site, till studying an area newspaper article.
“We were, like, ‘What is this thing? What’s happening? What does that mean for the community in Upper Burrell?’” she instructed The Epoch Occasions.
When residents contacted native planners and officers “early on” to get venture particulars, they wouldn’t talk about specifics, or “they didn’t really seem to know a lot about it,” Graber stated.
Shield PT, which stands for Shield Penn-Teller, was based in Graber’s Harrison Metropolis front room a decade in the past to problem fracking and different industrial improvement some residents say are degrading the world’s surroundings, she stated.
They haven’t gained many battles, however they proceed to point out up.
“Like with everything we work on, it’s always larger corporations and large industries that come into rural communities and think they can just do whatever they want,” Graber stated. “We don’t want to see that happen again … but I see history repeating itself again, and again, and again.”
A cursory Fb search finds dozens of advert hoc native teams with pages the place comparable claims are aired.
Texans in Granbury say “working-class residents living next to giant, loud, environmentally-destructive data centers are the ones paying the price for Texas’s crypto boom.” Minnesotans name on state legislators to impose extra restrictions as a result of “these developments are reshaping our communities.”
The three,500 members of the Cease Duneland and Valpo/Wheeler Knowledge Facilities Fb group in Indiana specific frustration {that a} planning fee has threatened to waive public hearings on a proposed knowledge middle venture. The web page is rife with feedback similar to, “We have no voice anymore? Seems like that’s a dictatorship in my opinion.”
Tax Income Boon
The Knowledge Middle Coalition, which represents 36 “hyperscalers”—companies together with Meta, AWS, and Microsoft—and co-location firms that personal knowledge facilities leased to operators, similar to Equinix, acknowledged knowledge middle tasks are drawing resistance in some areas, however famous most criticism is commonplace for any improvement proposal.
“I think that sometimes gets lost in media coverage,” Jon Hukill, communications director of the Washington-based coalition, instructed The Epoch Occasions. “Data centers want to be good neighbors. They communicate with HOAs [home owners associations] and citizens and local and state governments before, during, and after the permitting process.”
“The data center industry is not monolithic. There are a wide variety of companies,” Hukill stated.
Knowledge facilities are costly to construct and plan to be working in a neighborhood for a few years, he stated, so builders and operators strictly comply with legal guidelines, zoning, and land-use laws.
Knowledge facilities are eligible for tax incentives and different inducements, however not more than different proposed developments, he stated.
Based on a 50-state survey by land-use regulation agency Husch Blackwell, 36 states have “some kind of legislation authorizing tax incentives for new data center development” with “no standard template for how incentives are structured.”
There are challenges particular to knowledge facilities that states are more and more recognizing, Hukill stated.
The “most popular tool” builders search is “a sales [tax] and use tax exemption,” he stated, as a result of the “tremendous amount of servers, the brain stem of the data center, where all the action happens” should be “refreshed every three to five years.”

That’s a “tremendous” recurring funding, Hukill stated. “So you have the significant upfront investment of building the shell and the building, and then filling it with servers and chillers and coolers and all the infrastructure, and on top of that, you have to refresh these servers every three-to-five years. Recognizing that—the magnitude of that capital investment—is just so significant.”
These tax abatements are hardly “tax breaks” within the broader sense and profit the communities they construct in, he stated, pointing to a February PriceWaterhouseCoopers report that decided the information middle business contributed $727 billion to the nation’s annual gross home product in 2023.
Land use lawyer Colleen Gillis and her Reston, Virginia-based Curata Companions, represents builders, together with knowledge middle firms, in northern Virginia’s “Data Center Alley.”
Gillis known as knowledge facilities “a highly efficient land use” that pays massive dividends for cities and counties.
She stated knowledge facilities generate “a five-to-one ratio” in native and state tax income in contrast with different business makes use of in actual property property taxes, private property taxes, payments-in-lieu-of-taxes, and costs.
Gillis, a member of the City Land Institute’s Knowledge Middle Product Council, helped produce a December 2024 Native Tips for Knowledge Middle Growth that spells out how municipalities can profit from negotiating tax abatements.
Knowledge facilities in Virginia are eligible for a gross sales tax exemption for “refreshing” laptop tools in the event that they commit $150 million in new capital funding—or $70 million for “distressed localities”—and create not less than 50 new jobs that pay not less than 150 p.c of the prevailing annual common wage.
That’s a profitable method, Gillis stated. People who don’t qualify for the abatement pay a hefty value.
Gillis stated that “unlike our desk chairs” that depreciate over 10 years, “this computer equipment is usually getting replaced every three-to-five years.”
“That’s why the value, the revenue from approving a data center in any one of these jurisdictions, is so attractive,” she stated.
‘More Pluses Than Minuses’
Patrick Boss, Port of Quincy public affairs and enterprise improvement director, stated his city of 8,300 on the Columbia River in central Washington state has benefited tremendously from knowledge middle improvement.

Quincy, on the east aspect of the Northern Cascades, is an agricultural neighborhood amid river-bottom sage and apple-orchard-latticed hills. It was one of many first locations to see knowledge middle improvement when Microsoft purchased a 75-acre bean discipline in 2006 as “the internet of everything” boomed.
“As a result of that, it has caused companies to come looking around—not just data centers … manufacturers, food processors, cold storage companies,” Boss stated, with knowledge center-anchored “clustering” now spanning three counties alongside the Columbia.
Quincy’s assessed worth in 2006 was about $500 million and is now about $8.5 billion, Boss stated, a “15-fold, 17-fold increase in less than 20 years.”
Boss stated Washington state gives a gross sales tax exemption for knowledge facilities, however the facilities pay property taxes and utility taxes.
“We’ve got a new high school, new hospital, a new indoor youth sports stadium. The property-taxing districts in our area are doing fairly well,” he stated.
“I would say, overall, plus versus minus? It’s been far more pluses than minuses.”
‘New Stadium Scam’
GridBrief power e-newsletter editor Marc Oestreich, a land-use marketing consultant, maintains that whereas state provided incentives are scrutinized, usually neglected are tiers of advantages provided on the native degree, He argued in a Could 6 Motive Journal article that knowledge facilities are “the new stadium scam” with cities and counties giving builders sweetheart offers that don’t ship advantages for taxpayers.
He cites quite a few examples, similar to a 40-year tax abatement on tools by 2068 in trade for annual payments-in-lieu-of-taxes of a flat $2.5 million, or 30 p.c of assessed tax, whichever is larger, in La Porte, Indiana; a “generational tax holiday.”
In Kansas Metropolis, Oestreich writes, Evergy is constructing two new energy crops “largely to meet data center demand—costs to be passed on to customers,” and in northern Virginia, Dominion Power’s “data center grid upgrades are now a line item in statewide electric rate hikes.”
Usually flying underneath the radar are tax increment financing applications by which property taxes and different tax revenues are funneled right into a neighborhood redevelopment district, slightly than right into a municipality’s normal fund.

Examples embody Mount Nice, Wisconsin, the place Microsoft certified for a tax increment financing district, initially created for Foxconn, that enables it “to recapture up to 42 percent of its own property taxes—not only avoiding taxes, but being reimbursed with public dollars,” Oestreich writes.
“Today’s stadium boondoggle is a server farm: shinier, techier, but often just as bad for taxpayers,” he stated. “Local economic development officials tilt the scales, suspend the rules, and give away the farm.”
In written responses to emailed questions from The Epoch Occasions, Oestreich stated if he was advising an area authorities on how you can deal with a knowledge middle venture, “The first question should be: ‘Would this happen anyway, without the subsidy?’ Most of the time, the answer is ‘Yes.’”
He stated there’s “a deep pool of research showing that roughly 75 percent of economic development incentives go to projects that would’ve happened regardless. Why? Because companies—especially at this scale—choose sites based on infrastructure, workforce, access to customers, and suppliers. Not because a county council offered them a gilded shovel.”
Oestreich stated “the more honest question is: ‘What will this cost us—in infrastructure strain, lost tax revenue, or foregone opportunity? And are we asking the developer to pay their share?’”
If improvement codes, land-use laws, and zoning are outdated, then revise them to make sure “free and fair enterprise, and then get out of the way,” however don’t accomplish that merely to appease a selected applicant, he stated.
“Local governments don’t need to build winners—they need to build rules that don’t play favorites. Smart zoning. Predictable permitting. Competitive taxes,” Oestreich stated. “If you do those well, it won’t take bribes, negotiations, or complex algebra to bring investment to town.”
Many knowledge middle builders are creating, or aggravating, resistance and opposition by insisting on nondisclosure agreements, and plenty of native planners are too pliant in conceding to them, he stated.
“Communities don’t know they’ve handed out 30 years of property tax forgiveness until the ink is dry,” Oestreich stated. “The best practice is: no special deals, no secret negotiations, and no socialized costs.”
Knowledge middle improvement is an effective factor, he stated, however a number of the offers being struck with native planners will not be.
“I’m not against data centers—in fact, I think they’re an inevitable and welcome part of a modern economy,” Oestreich stated. “But they need to play by the same few rules the rest of us do. If a data center requires substation upgrades or new transmission lines, then yes, it should contribute to those costs. That’s not punishment. That’s basic economics.”
For those who discovered this text attention-grabbing, please take into account supporting conventional journalism
Our first version was printed 25 years in the past from a basement in Atlanta. In the present day, The Epoch Occasions brings fact-based, award-winning journalism to thousands and thousands of Individuals.
Our journalists have been threatened, arrested, and assaulted, however our dedication to unbiased journalism has by no means wavered. This yr marks our twenty fifth yr of unbiased reporting, free from company and political affect.
That’s why you’re invited to a limited-time introductory supply — simply $1 per week — so you may be a part of thousands and thousands already celebrating unbiased information.