Alleged Epstein Victims
Sue Former Victoria’s Secret CEO
For Allegedly Enabling Him
Revealed
Two of Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged victims consider he had assist pulling off his horrific intercourse trafficking ring … and are pointing fingers at former Victoria’s Secret CEO Les Wexner … TMZ has discovered.
In new court docket paperwork, obtained by TMZ, 2 Jane Does are suing Wexner for allegedly enabling Epstein’s crimes by giving him assets, entry to his mansion, and the looks of legitimacy.
Based on the docs, which have been filed Thursday, the ladies say they have been 17 — and subsequently minors — once they have been sexually assaulted at Epstein’s Manhattan mansion on East 71st Avenue … which they claimed Wexner had purchased in 1989 earlier than he “transferred it to Epstein for a fraction of its value.”
The lawsuit says the ladies have been employed to therapeutic massage Epstein on the mansion, claiming he allegedly caught his hand into Jane Doe 1’s underwear and “digitally penetrated her without her consent” whereas she was massaging him.
The docs say the lady was so upset she ran to the lavatory crying. The swimsuit alleges that in future visits, Epstein additionally “fondled her breasts” and “groped her genitals” with out her consent.
Jane Doe 2 claims she was pressured to therapeutic massage the billionaire’s penis together with different ladies whereas he allegedly “touched their breasts and genitals” with out their consent.
The lawsuit argues that Epstein wouldn’t have been capable of pull off the assaults with out Wexner’s assist … claiming that he gave Epstein no less than $200 Million between 1987 and 2007.
The docs additionally state Wexner gave Epstein the personal airplane he used to fly his victims.
They declare Wexner even gave Epstein “power and prestige” by naming him trustee and director of The Wexner Basis. The Jane Does argue Epstein’s trafficking ring wouldn’t have existed with out the ex-Victoria’s Secret proprietor.
They’re suing the Epstein property for gender-motivated violence and Wexner for enabling gender-motivated violence … they usually’re looking for unspecified damages.
